Talk:Pye Green
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I recommend Pye Green BT Tower be merged to Pye Green per WP:LOCAL. Any objections? —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-31 07:08Z
- Yes. They are two entirely different subjects. Why would a merged article be better in this case? It makes no sense. Harumphy 10:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's not really an article on its own, just a stub, and hard to expand. WP:LOCAL explains the reasoning for merging it to the parent locale. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-31 14:07Z
- The first part of your reply could be applied equally to any stub. And why is it hard to expand? Is it simply that you don't know much about the subject? If so, how can you be sure that everyone else's knowledge of the subject is as limited as your own? Another thing, this article has just been through AfD and the result was 'keep'. How much more of our precious spare time do you think you are entitled to waste?Harumphy 15:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Stay calm, please, I was the one that closed the AFD as "keep" :). I agree that the statement about stubs applies to stubs in general, and in fact, most stubs about places of local interest should be merged to their parent locale. Okay, I won't say this article is "hard to expand", but this is as much content as we have right now, so it should be merged. If it's ever expanded to a full article (i.e. 10 times the size it is now) it can be split off again. I feel like I'm just repeating WP:LOCAL :) —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-01 00:27Z
- The first part of your reply could be applied equally to any stub. And why is it hard to expand? Is it simply that you don't know much about the subject? If so, how can you be sure that everyone else's knowledge of the subject is as limited as your own? Another thing, this article has just been through AfD and the result was 'keep'. How much more of our precious spare time do you think you are entitled to waste?Harumphy 15:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's not really an article on its own, just a stub, and hard to expand. WP:LOCAL explains the reasoning for merging it to the parent locale. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-31 14:07Z
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pye Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060528050638/http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/pye-green.asp to http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/pye-green.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)