 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Pubic hair fetishism page were merged into Pubic hair on 5 April 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Gallery?
editThe photos in the gallery section of this page are completely unnecessary, except for the fetishists themselves who come to this page to get their rocks off. There's a single photo at the top of the page illustrating what pubic hair is. That should be enough. 68.77.21.60 (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. I also think that most of the material in this article has anything to do with fetishism.Enthusiast (talk) 10:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Paraphilia?
editI don't really grasp what makes this a 'paraphilia'. Pubic hair grows naturally and it used to be the norm to leave it on. I'm quite young myself (generation Y, i.e. generation with a significant population suffering 'hair phobia'), but I don't see what makes this unusual. Witproduct (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
First painting depicting pubic hair
editIt's not the one mentioned in the article but Death and the maiden from Hans Baldung in 1517. Wikitom2 (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Fetish
editIn the article on Fetish, there are no descriptions of body parts being a fetish. In this article there are descriptions of all sorts of things, but none of them seem to be the definition of pubic hair fetishism. It may be a nelogism. Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 22:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
