Talk:Psi Serpentis

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Companions

edit

Something seems to be wrong with this page. The primary Psi Serpentis (HD 140538, HIP 77052) is at a parallax of 68.16 mas. Per SIMBAD other two stars that are listed (HD 140527, HIP 77043) and (HD 140489, HIP 77034) are at 3.17 and 5.64 mas, respectively. I think they are line-of-sight companions only. ARICNS only shows this as a double-star. Could somebody please confirm this information and cite sources? Thank you. — RJH 19:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I removed the following unsourced entry as potentially misleading:
Orbiting this pair with a separation of 3.5 arcminutes is the +8.8 magnitude K-type Psi Serpentis C. Slightly closer, at a distance of 2.9 arcminutes, is the +10.4 magnitude Psi Serpentis D. The brightest companion, Psi Serpentis E, a magnitude +7.1 G-type giant, is also the most distant, being separated from the primary by 5.9 arcminutes, or at least 5200 Astronomical Units.[citation needed]
The SIMBAD entry indicates only that this is a double star system.—RJH (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Psi Serpentis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply