Talk:Projekt Records

'Not to be confused with...'

Perhaps it would be worth having this section to mention the Darkwave artists 'Pro-jekt' and 'Project Pitchfork'? J Milburn 21:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Projektfest 2007

Now, this information is from a blurb on the Projekt MySpace page, so it's possible it may disappear, or even change. I've liked to the MySpace page so that people don't accuse me of being completely loopy, and I'll paste the segment here. I admit this my just plain change and become inaccurate, but for the moment...

Projekt has over 200 releases (when you add the Projekt titles to the Projekt: Archive titles). Projekt has held 7 Projektfests (1996, 1997. 4 in 1998 + 2002) and is seriously considering another 2 day event in early 2007. Thanks for your interest....

...here is the text of the blurb. - BalthCat 03:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and though that says it has held 7 Projektfests, I guess it's considering Chicago and Mexico '97 to be one Projektfest. Info on Projektfest 2002 can be found here and previous fests here

Arcana?

I am about to delete Arcana from this page, while they have been on a few Projekt compilations, they have never been signed to Projekt, they have only had releases on Cold Meat Industry and EREBUS. Thank you! (Kilby6 06:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC))

You were almost correct. Just to be sure, I checked Projekt's website. Le Serpent Rouge (US Edition) was pressed by Projekt. I'm readding it for this reason. One disc has been pressed by Projekt and they're obviously aligned with, and supported by Projekt. If you disagree still, let us know why. - BalthCat 12:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, fair enough. Yes, they did release that album on Projekt so it's safe to add, my mistake. They have also been on a few Projekt compilations. (Kilby6 06:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC))

Lisa

Now this may be an assumption on my part, but the wording on the Projekt website has always been plural, and considering Lisa IS the Project Promotions person, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that she's part of a two-person team (being his wife) and not just an employee. As such, they run Projekt, not just him. I know they recently had a child, but I doubt that has pulled her out of the action completely, if much at all. - BalthCat 21:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, Sam and Lisa have gone through a divorce. I think she's still an employee at Projekt. I don't know how it works out though. (Kilby6 06:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC))

Lisa and Sam are no longer married, changed the article to mention "ex-wife" (Kilby6 19:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Projekt Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060526190639/http://www.projekt.com/projekt/napster01.asp to http://www.projekt.com/projekt/napster01.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100516233206/http://www.projekt.com/projekt/newsarticles/downloads.asp to http://www.projekt.com/projekt/newsarticles/downloads.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207003053/http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/permalink/2012/120120megasupport to http://digitalmusicnews.com/permalink/2012/120120megasupport

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Notable artists

Why are there so many non-notable artists listed? Wikipedia is not for promotion. The Banner talk 11:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

• A complete list of artists is encyclopedic and relevant to the article subject. Chubbles (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Can you point to the relevant policy that states that? (That is, a community policy, not a local agreement). The Banner talk 15:28, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
    • it's not a matter of policy, except insofar as policy does not prohibit such a list. It's rather a matter of guidelines and of user interest. I can rehash those arguments for you again, but it doesn't feel necessary, since we soent a whole month talking about it already. Chubbles (talk) 09:53, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
      • So there is no policy or guideline, just your personal preference. The Banner talk 10:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
        • The content of lists is not governed by policy. It is governed by guidelines, and I have noted them already in past conversations; most notably, WP:CSC and WP:LISTPURP. But this, again, we have talked about at length elsewhere, so you are quite aware that what I am stating is not based on pure personal preference. I'm not terribly interested in repeating this debate. Chubbles (talk) 13:11, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
          • I can understand that you do not want to talk about your personal preferences. Especially when you promote advertising. But I am willing to accept independent sources for al entries in the list. The Banner talk 14:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
            • That is neither necessary nor required, nor helpful to the reader. Chubbles (talk) 06:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@Chubbles, Jdcooper, and The Banner: Sometime after the discussion above, Jdcooper pulled non-notable artists. I endorse the cleanup done in Special:Diff/1166818159. Although verifiability is required, not everything needs to be included and due weight are relevant. Consensus should be reached before restored again, because the burden to establish consensus falls on those looking to insert it. Graywalls (talk) 04:29, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

I support the cleanup. Wikipedia is not a place for promotion of non-notable artists. The Banner talk 17:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)