Talk:Project Alberta/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 04:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'll start this review shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • No DABs, external links good.
  • Images appropriately licensed.
  • Shedon or Sheldon Dike? I imagine the latter, but you never know...
  • Hyphenated air conditioned and 155 degree.
  • which would want to account for everything when what would be required huh?
    • Ramsey overcame the problem of how to ship through the San Francisco Port of Embarkation. The port wanted a detailed list of what was being sent so it could track it to ensure delivery, but what needed to be shipped was still subject to last-minute change. He simply designated everything as a "bomb assembly kit". Hope this is clear enough. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Need something to explain the Gadget.
  • What were the bomb assemblies? Everything except the uranium/plutonium?
    • And the Polonium-Beryllium initiators, yeah. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Suggest using military time format
  • Parsons, who as the "weaponeer" was in command of the mission, either properly punctuate this bit by setting off "as the weaponeer" as a dependent clause or move it to the end of the phrase.
    • Split the sentence
  • behind by the aircraft Group Operations Officer delete aircraft
  • For security reasons, components that it was decided not to return to the United States were dumped at sea This is awkward.
    • For security reasons, components not returned to the United States were dumped at sea Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Put the title of Alvarez into title case.
  • Your portal bar would look better above the Manhattan Project navbox than below.

--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

    • I did, very interesting. The comment about the portal bar was just a suggestion, so feel free to move it back if you'd prefer. Sorry for not making that clearer. Everything looks good to go.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply