Talk:ProjectLibre

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 46.103.231.186 in topic Manual for ProjectLibre

Deleted "LibreOffice" affiliation edit

I just deleted this sentence: "ProjectLibre is supportive of LibreOffice; it complements their replacement of Microsoft Office components.[citation needed]". Not only that the source for this is missing since a long time, but there are sources which show that this is just a wish, but far from being reality. See e.g.:

In general it would be beneficial if the article would be less advertisement and more encyclopedia. --Tomakos (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Manual for ProjectLibre edit

I was wondering whether the wiki would be a good platform to make a Manual for the ProjectLibre, open source project management software? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardsong (talkcontribs) 04:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ardsong! No, Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia and this the wrong place for software manuals. The equivalent of Wikipedia but for books would be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikibooks, which is run by the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia, just as Wikipedia. For writing a manual for ProjectLibre I would suggest either to use Wikibooks or to self-host a wiki software on the ProjectLibre website. Examples for such wiki software for self-hosting would be e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki, which is the same wiki software that wikipedia uses, or any other wiki software listed e.g. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_wiki_software --46.103.231.186 (talk) 16:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Advertisements versus Sources edit

Advertisements are primary sources TEDickey (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply