Talk:The Potash Twins
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Namedropping, puffery and fancruft
editThere is a WP:SPA editor, Purpleturnip123 (talk · contribs) that appears to have a WP:COI or other obsession with these two folks and is hell-bent on inserting all kinds of puffery, name-dropping and fancruft. I spent time cleaning the article up yesterday only to find the spa had restored almost all of the puffery and name-drops. This editor also thinks this article is the top priority for both biographies and musician articles as evidenced by this ridiculous edit. Toddst1 (talk) 00:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Reflection on the "the article may rely excessively on source too closely associated with the subject"
editOn which sources is an article most based? I would say the most used sources so let is say more than 2 times. On that version, the most used sources (used more than 2 times) on the article are from Medium, American Songwriter, The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, Food & Wine, BroadwayWorld. Could someone explain to me how this sources are "too closely associated with the subject"? --Crazy runner (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)