This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
- added On-Line scholarly article, RJensen Rjensen 08:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
Anyone notice that someone has sabotaged this page? I don't know how to fix it. yay! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.162.253 (talk) 22:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, my first proper page edit as a new user, so please forgive any stupid mistakes! Obviously this is a big subject (political history) and only a very small page - is there an obvious reason for that, or is it just that nobody has edited it? CreativeLogic 17:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've also noticed that the scope is quite limited, so this page could be benefited by adding additional countries' definitions of political history as it appears to be limiting in perspective with the few that are listed. Audlz (talk) 19:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Journal
editI understand there is a publication named "Diplomatic History". Should there be mention of it somewhere? Drutt (talk) 01:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK I linked it:
Political or diplomatic
editIn some parts, especially towards the end, it is not clear whether this article is about diplomatic or political history. these are two different things and should not be confused. Greece666 (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- This article is mostly about diplomatic history, which is considered quite a separate field for the last 100 years everywhere in the world. I will try to repair. Rjensen (talk) 10:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Requesting a redirect from "Political History"
editCan anyone please connect this article to "Political History"? Look at the article Francisco Gil-White, Knowledge Management links to Knowledge management, yet Political History is red.--Adûnâi (talk) 12:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- OK done Rjensen (talk) 12:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)