Talk:Pleins pouvoirs
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Bianchi-Bihan in topic Controversial claims require strong documentation
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Controversial claims require strong documentation edit
This article and the identically named article in the French Wikipedia were created at the same time.
The claim made in this article, if accurate, certainly deserves to be in Wikipedia, even at the cost of sullying the mantle of the revered playwright.
However—no page numbers or quotes from the externally linked book are given. And there are no references or citations as such. Moreover, if the antisemitism claim has substance, much more should be said to make the case. Who has "seen in this work the evidence of his antisemitism" and who that "wrote it was only superficial?" Unless the statements in this article are better documented, it will probably be deleted.--Foobarnix (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I've only read the French version. And a citation is given in the French article. You can translate it or find a translation, as you wish. Bianchi-Bihan (talk) 14:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)