 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8/2/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Cleanup Tag edit
Added cleanup. This article spends too much time on the etymology of the word and not enough time actually explaining what Plectics is and why it is in any way relevant or important. As an encyclopedic article, this is nigh useless.--Isotope23 17:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- I think I've cleaned up the article, so I think we can remove the cleanup tag. However as you say the article should be expanded perhaps we should add the "expand" tag? Paul August ☎ 19:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- I still think the word history quote is needlessly long and pointless. Could be summarized before removing the tag. I've also fixed the first part a bit since it looks like it is heading for a no-consensus.--Isotope23 19:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Well cleanup as you think appropriate, then remopve the tag. Paul August ☎ 04:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- The current version, while not perfect, is acceptable. Removing tag I added.--Isotope23 21:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- Well cleanup as you think appropriate, then remopve the tag. Paul August ☎ 04:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I still think the word history quote is needlessly long and pointless. Could be summarized before removing the tag. I've also fixed the first part a bit since it looks like it is heading for a no-consensus.--Isotope23 19:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Original reasearch tag edit
I see no original reasearch or unverified claims in the article, unless someone objects I'm going to remove that tag. Paul August ☎ 19:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- I've removed the "OR" tag. Paul August ☎ 04:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)