| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Planeat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Critical reception
editYes, in another article it's one paragaph. However, what is done in another article is a horrible way to write an article.
Another article might have "Awards" before "Critical reception". Does that mean that article is right? Maybe, maybe not. In this case, the one "award" this movie won was from a non-notable film festival.
In the present case, the "Critical reception" section cannot be one paragraph. Why? Yes, in another article it is. Maybe that case is correct, maybe not. It doesn't matter as this is different. In this article, we don't have an introductory sentence summarizing what critics had to say. The other article does. Why don't we add one here? Simple, we don't have anything to summarize it that isn't synthesis. In the other article, we have Rotten Tomatoes' summary. In this case, the movie has gotten too little attention to have been reviewed by enough critics for Rotten Tomatoes to have a summary. As a result, lumping them together produces a pseudo-paragraph with no main idea. Rather, each review is its own little stubby paragraph. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)