Talk:Pierre-sur-Haute military radio station/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Pi.1415926535 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 17:44, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


I'll take this review. I'm excited to be put on a French military watchlist. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:44, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lede

edit
  • There's some material in the lede (the mountain details and the ski resort) that isn't in the main text. I would add that to the infrastructure section, and remove the ski resort sentence from the lede.
  • I'd rephrase the sentence as In April 2013, the French interior intelligence agency DCRI pressured the president of Wikimedia France into deleting the French-language Wikipedia article about the station.
  • The next sentence could also use some rephrasing, perhaps something like As a result of the controversy, the article temporarily became the most read page on the French Wikipedia, which was noted as an example of the Streisand effect.

History

edit

Role

edit

Infrastructure

edit

Controversy over Wikipedia article

edit
  • The sentence In April 2013... attracted attention from the French interior intelligence agency DCRI. isn't really accurate. The agency was clearly aware of the article before then, particularly since they attempted to have it deleted in March. I would recommend rewriting the first few sentences here to clarify the order of events.
  • Add {{clear}} so that the image doesn't squeeze the references

Other

edit

@Pi.1415926535: I've made changes to the article. Skyshifter talk 22:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Looks good! Passing now. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: