Talk:Physical Review Letters
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Headbomb in topic "Physical Review Letters A" listed at Redirects for discussion
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
This can really be improved; how about we add a list of extremely famous papers? EPR, for example, wrote a letter describing entanglement to Phys. Rev. Lett. 131.111.55.13 (talk) 11:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- This could be a good starting point: Collection of milestone Letters (all free to read; stretches from 1958 to 2001).--139.191.190.4 (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- And see Tables 1-3 in this Physics Today article: Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review.--139.191.190.4 (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
"Physical Review Letters A" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Physical Review Letters A. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)