Talk:Perspective

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Questionefisica in topic Perspectivity
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

means the pointer view of something —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.11.173.194 (talk) 21:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Perspectivity edit

I don't think the mathematical term should be either the primary topic for this dab, or the root that the other articles are sub-listed under. I'd consider readers would be better served with the visual perspective not being so relegated. What do others think? Widefox; talk 11:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree, and try to explain.

Question1: which disambiguation in the first position?
"Perspectivity" was introduced (10:07, 10 January 2014‎ D.Lazard) with the comment "a geometrical concept which models and explains all the topics in this section", as the reason for the top position; today 2020 substituted by "the formation of an image in a picture plane of a scene viewed from a fixed point, and its modelling in geometry" (may be too long), that don't give reason for first place. More, I think it would be nice to have the same order in the section title and in the list.

Question2: Title of the section. Two options: "Vision and mathematics", or "Vision, graphics, mathematics".
I prefer to add "graphics", because independent from the others, and because one of the disambiguation link is so named. I prefer "Vision, graphics, mathematics", no "and", 3 terms equally separated to express same relevance; instead of "Vision, graphics and mathematics" which may subtend the relation between the first two with the last one.

I suggest for the section:
Vision, graphics, mathematics

--Questionefisica (talk) 18:52, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply