Talk:Perinatal matrices

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Moonriddengirl in topic Copyright problem removed

Untitled

edit

This page would benefit from additional sources- there appears to be one major source, and there is an in-text reference by author's last name without any corresponding information about the citation whatsoever. Furthermore, the article seems to be implicitly supportive of the more proscriptive and clinical elements (how a birth "should be", and potential health consequences thereof); as a layman I suspect these theories are both unverifiable and well outside mainstream science and medicine, and some clarification of its acceptance or lack thereof would be useful. D213 (talk) 21:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply