Talk:Pentium Dual-Core

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge to Pentium

???

edit

There is PC on sales at Interdiscount here in Switzerland with a "Intel Pentium Dualcore 915, 2.8 GHz" I think this should be added to the article. http://www.interdiscount.ch/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10001&storeId=10001&productId=108653&langId=3

exterminator 11:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's a typo in the ad. It's an Intel Pentium D 915 / 2.8 Ghz "Presler". —RP88 11:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

T2060 spec

edit

http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number/proc_info_table.pdf Djyang 19:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Model

edit

Pentium Dual Core is based on Core Duo, not Core 2 Duo, it don't have EM64T and the CPUID is 06ECh (model 0Eh, Yonah) http://download.intel.com/design/mobile/SPECUPDT/31651501.pdf

Not true, this is part of the Core 2 Duo family and has a model number SLA3H http://www.intel.com/products/processor/pentium_dual-core/specs.htm
There have been two sets of chips Intel has called Intel Pentium Dual-Core - mobile processors apparently based on the original Intel Core processors and desktop processors based on the Core 2 processors. The one with the SLA3H identifier was one of the desktop processors. Guy Harris 17:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I merged this article section to Intel Core.

edit

I think that this article is unnecessary. It is quite short, and can be merged with Intel Core article. Anyway, I made section for Pentium Dual-Core in Intel Core Article. Christisoursavior 03:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)ChristisoursaviorReply

It would appear the above no longer applies. 205.157.110.11 20:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dangeous Reference!

edit

Would somebody remove the 9th reference(I don't know how)? It's a malware site! Wlijiu (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

According to who? It would help if you were more specific, but I take it you are referring to the link to ripping.org. — Aluvus t/c 01:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

New Models

edit

I added the link to socket 1156 in the right sidebar. I'm not up to writing a blurb, yet, but please note that there is a Pentium released as a Clarkdale.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Non consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC) Pentium Dual-CorePentiumReply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


New Mobile Model/s

edit

Was trying to throw together a page for the new mobile socket and I keep finding new info, conflicting info, and just basically a never ending slurry of slow downs! I don't even LIKE Intel and I'm doing this! :\ There is a new "P6000" that is based on Nehalem architecture, as well as Celeron P4500 and P4505s, all dual cores and with on-chip graphics. P4505 doesn't use the 988 pin socket that I'm working up the page for, and I don't know if there are more Pentium models or not since I didn't even plan to find one to begin with! Intel needs to learn to not diversify so much, only confuses the end user on what exactly you are buying!

Anywho here is where I came across the Pentium listing (4th from bottom as of this posting): http://ark.intel.com/MySearch.aspx?s=t&Sockets=988&CoreCountMin=1&CoreCountMax=8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Formula350 (talkcontribs) 03:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've added references to P6000 and U5400 on the Pentium page. Note that the Pentium Dual-Core page only covers CPUs under that name, not the current Core and Nehalem based Pentium processors. The lists of Pentium and Celeron CPUs already covered these correctly. Arndbergmann (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)xm v cmbvxcvb zh hjsdvgvsvu svugsfkg suvfgdu fksdgfvReply

Merge to Pentium

edit

I propose merging this into Pentium since List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors has now been merged into List of Intel Pentium microprocessors (see decision discussion at Talk:List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors#Merge to Pentium). This merge would also be in line with Celeron and Celeron Dual-Core branding (notice there is no article for such). Note the current situation is also somewhat backwards from List of Intel Core M microprocessors and Intel Core#Core M (single brand article but multiple lists; however, there is a Core M disambiguation page). See also an earlier historic discussion at #New Models about the same merge. 50.53.1.33 (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Closing given that discussion is stale and with no consensus. Klbrain (talk) 19:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pentium Dual-Core. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply