Talk:Peasenhall murder

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The item entitled Rose Harsent is so brief, and gives so few details, that it seems reasonable to me to put all the peas in one pot, or hall.

AT2 Andrew Thomas 2 (talk) 22:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

NPOV

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Julien Fellowes paragraph ended "As a theory this simply does not pass muster." This unsupported statement constituted a blatant NPOV violation, and has been removed. Lusanaherandraton (talk) 01:22, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I concurr. Both should be combined in one article 0police (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic