Talk:Patriot Act, Title III, Subtitle A

talk..

For a featured article this page has an extreme lack of discussion.. i.e. none, if there is an archive, someone please link it?

There is none. JHMM13^(Disc) 21:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

How did an article become an FA without any dicussion? just curious 70.177.12.108 21:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, the FAC process does not take that into account when it decides to promote an article. I wrote a featured article that had little to no meaningful discussion but was at featured quality because I chose to bring it there. It is possible that this article is not worthy of being a featured article, however, and if you feel that way, I suggest signing up a user account and bring the issue up with the fine folks over at featured article review. I personally agree with you that this article seems a bit weak in the analysis area and appears to simply be a summary. However, you might do well to consult the debate that took place in this article's FAC for any issues brought up then. It should be noted that FA standards were significantly lower in April of 2006, so you might be very well justified in proposing the delisting of this article. JHMM13^(Disc) 03:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Merger Proposal

• A merger proposal was put up way back in 2009, I currently oppose a merger as it seems this article has enough content and is a former featured article. If there is no opposition I will remove the tags, please provide your opinions. Gsingh (talk) 19:27, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:USA PATRIOT Act, Title I which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Patriot Act, Title III, Subtitle A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060415003855/https://www.treas.gov/press/releases/po1044.htm to http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/po1044.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051129045328/http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/08aug20031600/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2003/julqtr/31cfr103.100.htm to http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/08aug20031600/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2003/julqtr/31cfr103.100.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051129045328/http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/08aug20031600/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2003/julqtr/31cfr103.100.htm to http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/08aug20031600/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2003/julqtr/31cfr103.100.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)