Talk:Patersonia occidentalis

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an a range map be included in this article to improve its quality.

Australia: South Australia / Tasmania / Victoria / Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Patersonia occidentalis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the State Library of South Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

There seems to be a problem across a number of pages of plant species being described as endemic to Western Australia when they actually have a much broader range, and when this isn't supported by the souce — generally WA Florabase. WA Florabase is a highly credible souce, but an appearance in WA Florabase in itself is not in itself evidence of endemism to WA. This is something I've noticed as someone interested in Victorian flora. I'm happy to edit them as and when I come across them but if anyone has other suggestions about how to address this I'm all ears. I'm not a very experienced Wikipedian so I'm not sure if there's something obvious or standard practice I'm missing. PeoplesFootscray (talk) 06:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic