Talk:Partial thromboplastin time
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Partial thromboplastin time.
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
misleading image
editThe image that hints that INR is equal to PT/PTT... which is very misleading and I took it down.
Pishoygouda (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
It would be helpful if there was a disambiguation page for PTT, because now it directs you to something different.
- Have you looked at PTT? JFW | T@lk 00:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Too technical?
editI don't think that it's too technical. It doesn't go into details, and doesn't explain the technicalities of the test, or the specific interpretations that could be associated with its different readings. I'll remove the template. —Hexafluoride Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk 16:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Figures
editThe article says "reference range is between 30 seconds and 50 s", but (at least in the UK), a figure (ratio) is quoted as, for example, "borderline ised: 1.26" or "therapeutic range for APTT ratio is 1.5 to 2.5." ([1]). Can someone explain this usage in the article, please? what is meant by "therapeutic range"? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:16, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Why FIX is not included in the list PTT measures?
editIs this factor being left outside for some reason? otherwise it should be included because it is part of the intrinsic pathway FNVTSAC (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)