Talk:Paro Taktsang/Archive 1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Whiteguru in topic Observations
Archive 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paro Taktsang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Paro Taktsang/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

 

 


Result: Delisted. Legitmate concerns, tags on page, no opposition or improvements made. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Observations

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
  • Prose is well scribed.
  • Article layout follows MOS
  1. a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  • Reference 2 is a vague link and does not go to the appropriate page. A more appropriate link is found here.
  • Reference 4 does not refer to Padmasambhava as tutelary deity of Bhutan nor Tibet.
  • Timeline of Bhutanese history gives dates for visits by Padmasambhava to Bhutan, and his activities, including this monastery. It is here that Padmasambhava is referred to as the national patron saint
  • Examination of references in the Lede does not support This place was consecrated to tame the Tiger demon.[citation needed]
  • It has been mentioned by authors [who?]
  • This dance is performed in Paro as the Tsche festival. → Tshechu festival.
  • Recommend archive version of Reference 13
  • Reference 16 is a dead link.
  • Reference 17 is a dead link and has no archive version.
  1. a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  • Establishment as a meditation site this section relies upon a single source (which is not accessible).
  • The section Other structures within the precincts has been tagged since 2018 about no citation of sources
  • The section Paintings has been tagged since 2018 about no citation of sources
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • (the formal State Religion of Bhutan) should be moved from Structure to the Lede. Mentioning the religion of Bhutan in the description of a cave is manifestly inappropriate.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  • This is a somewhat older article created on 21 December 2005
  • Pageviews
  • 90 day Pageviews: 18,972
  • Daily average: 208
  • Page has had 183 editors since its creation in 2005
  • Most of the top editors have not visited this page since 2016.
  • A stable page with no edit wars noted.
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  • 10 images on the article
  • Takshang edit.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • First glimpse of Taktshang.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • Paro Padmasambhava.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • Milarepa statue.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic license. (Image relevance challenged. Article is about a monastery, dominant figure is Guru Rimpoche, not Milarepa)
  • Dance of the Black Hats - Paro Tsechu.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • Pinus wallichiana Bhutan2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • Taktshang (Tiger's Nest) Monastery, Paro Valley.jpg = This file has no description, and may be lacking other information. = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • Tigernest (Taktsang)-Kloster in Bhutan 2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.
  • Taktsang prayer wheel.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • Taktshang2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Subject to disclaimers. (This is likely unnecessary - there are 4 images of this monastery on this page.
  1. Notifying Editors:
  • Editor Nvvchar: Latest logged action 2016-08-31 11:11
  • Editor Tibetan Prayer: Latest logged action 2017-03-29 11:57
  • Editor Agnostic Monk: Latest logged action 2017-03-08 08:48
  • Editor Lorde1801: Latest logged action 2020-06-29 13:58
  • A total of three involved editors were able to be notified. Updated, --Whiteguru (talk) 09:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

  1. Overall:
  • For this article to retain GA status, some work is needed.
  • There are two tags on the page about not citing sources which need to be rectified or this article will most likely lose GA status. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Legitimate concerns raised above were not addressed. Should editors seek another reassessment, the issues raised above need to be addressed first before a reassessment can be commenced. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paro Taktsang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Paro Taktsang/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

 

 


Result: Delisted. Legitmate concerns, tags on page, no opposition or improvements made. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Observations

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
  • Prose is well scribed.
  • Article layout follows MOS
  1. a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  • Reference 2 is a vague link and does not go to the appropriate page. A more appropriate link is found here.
  • Reference 4 does not refer to Padmasambhava as tutelary deity of Bhutan nor Tibet.
  • Timeline of Bhutanese history gives dates for visits by Padmasambhava to Bhutan, and his activities, including this monastery. It is here that Padmasambhava is referred to as the national patron saint
  • Examination of references in the Lede does not support This place was consecrated to tame the Tiger demon.[citation needed]
  • It has been mentioned by authors [who?]
  • This dance is performed in Paro as the Tsche festival. → Tshechu festival.
  • Recommend archive version of Reference 13
  • Reference 16 is a dead link.
  • Reference 17 is a dead link and has no archive version.
  1. a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  • Establishment as a meditation site this section relies upon a single source (which is not accessible).
  • The section Other structures within the precincts has been tagged since 2018 about no citation of sources
  • The section Paintings has been tagged since 2018 about no citation of sources
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • (the formal State Religion of Bhutan) should be moved from Structure to the Lede. Mentioning the religion of Bhutan in the description of a cave is manifestly inappropriate.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  • This is a somewhat older article created on 21 December 2005
  • Pageviews
  • 90 day Pageviews: 18,972
  • Daily average: 208
  • Page has had 183 editors since its creation in 2005
  • Most of the top editors have not visited this page since 2016.
  • A stable page with no edit wars noted.
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  • 10 images on the article
  • Takshang edit.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • First glimpse of Taktshang.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • Paro Padmasambhava.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • Milarepa statue.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic license. (Image relevance challenged. Article is about a monastery, dominant figure is Guru Rimpoche, not Milarepa)
  • Dance of the Black Hats - Paro Tsechu.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • Pinus wallichiana Bhutan2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • Taktshang (Tiger's Nest) Monastery, Paro Valley.jpg = This file has no description, and may be lacking other information. = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • Tigernest (Taktsang)-Kloster in Bhutan 2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.
  • Taktsang prayer wheel.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • Taktshang2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Subject to disclaimers. (This is likely unnecessary - there are 4 images of this monastery on this page.
  1. Notifying Editors:
  • Editor Nvvchar: Latest logged action 2016-08-31 11:11
  • Editor Tibetan Prayer: Latest logged action 2017-03-29 11:57
  • Editor Agnostic Monk: Latest logged action 2017-03-08 08:48
  • Editor Lorde1801: Latest logged action 2020-06-29 13:58
  • A total of three involved editors were able to be notified. Updated, --Whiteguru (talk) 09:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

  1. Overall:
  • For this article to retain GA status, some work is needed.
  • There are two tags on the page about not citing sources which need to be rectified or this article will most likely lose GA status. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Legitimate concerns raised above were not addressed. Should editors seek another reassessment, the issues raised above need to be addressed first before a reassessment can be commenced. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)