Talk:Para-Nordic skiing classification/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 04:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman 04:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Almost forgot about this.

• There are a couple deadlinks: see here.
  • They are archived, but I think they will be back. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Prose review will come tomorrow. Couldn't get my head on to do it tonight. Wizardman 05:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Here are my prose concerns:

• "The classifications for para-Pordic skiing" para-nordic. Also, the article seems to alternate between para-nordic and para-Nordic; keep it consistent.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
• "skiing. [1] The" no space after punctuation.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
• "with LW10 being divided into LW10 and LW10," I feel like something's wrong here.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
• "International Stoke Mandeville Games Federation (ISMWSF)." Is there a reason the abbreviation and the name don't seem to match up? (You'd think it would be ISMGF; in fact that's the abbr used later on.)
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
• "ISMWSF In 2003, ISMWSF merged with" rm first ISMWSF
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
• "Scandinavia.[17]The" space after ref
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
• "During the 1980s, there were 3 sit-ski classes and 7 other classes." three, seven
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
• "this was defined as 84% for LW10, 93% for LW11 and 100% for LW12." convert the LWs to bluelinks. For some reason they link to LWX, LWXI and LWXII, even though 10-12 now have their own articles.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
• "Their finishing time would then by multiplied" be multiplied.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Mostly nitpicks. I'll put the article on hold and will pass when fixed. Wizardman 23:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

• All issues addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

  Looks good, so article passes. Wizardman 03:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)