Talk:Pantechnicon van

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Murgatroyd49 in topic Definition

Merge proposal

edit

or possibly just delete the other: it's a stub D.C.Rigate (talk) 15:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'd agree. The other one doesn't seem to be particularly well written either.Patrick lovell (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

citations

edit

A quick google found a bunch of citations: http://wordhistories.com/2014/02/16/pantechnicon/ [dead link]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zweibieren (talkcontribs) 05:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Definition

edit

This article does not give a definition of what a "Pantechnicon van" is, but only what it originally was. This is a bit confusing. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 11:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

It does obliquely, which is not very helpful. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply