Talk:Pan-nationalism

Poorly named

This article was originally called "pan movements". Pan-Americanism, and Pan-Islamism cannot be described legitimately as nationalist movements.--MacRusgail (talk) 12:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Why is Greater Korea here?

It links to the reunification of Korea, which is not exactly an expansionist idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.155.232 (talk) 02:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Pan-Nationalism = One and not Multi-Nationalism

In the section of other definitions it states:

Over the past few years, pan-nationalism has also been used by organizations such as the Pan-Nationalist Movement, to describe a political ideal which seeks to give every nation, described as an amalgamation of ethnicity and culture their own state. This is more popularly and historically known as self-determination.

This is paragraph describes Multi-Nationalism and not Pan-Nationalism, considering the term Pan implies one and/or singular. There is no citation to this assertion, nor can I find any such organisation called the "Pan-Nationalist Movement" and which espouses such multi-nationalism views and therefore it is clearly an attempt to misinform and vandalise the article. i will remove this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.1.202.203 (talk) 18:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Inclusion of white nationalism

Many pan-nationalisms do not seek to create a unified state, but rather to foster identity and solidarity: for instance, such is the case of Pan-Africanism or even Pan-Slavism, which has dropped the unification project. It has been used historically to create "molten pot" white identities in places like Australia (e.g., "white Australia") or the US, and is more explicitly employed by prominent far-right movements/websites like Stormfront. White nationalism seems to be quite widely discussed and there is a large article about it. --Humanophage (talk) 14:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)