This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Isn't there some dispute as to whether The Eustace Diamonds, which doesn't particularly concern politics, and in which the Pallisers play only a rather minor role, should really be considered part of this sequence? I've certainly read criticism saying as much. I know it is frequently considered as such, and appears in boxed sets with the others, and was adapted in the miniseries, but this seems to make things too neat. There are, after all, considerable overlaps between the Barsetshire novels and the Pallisers (including the old duke and Plantagenet, who first appear in the former sequence). john k (talk) 19:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Phineas Finn is one of the three most important characters in the series, in fact two of the novels are named after him and yet the actor who played him is not mentioned in the article. This seems very odd to me. I also think Barrington Erle is more important than a good half of the other characters listed, he certainly gets considerably more air time than Mrs. Bonteen for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.18.4.240 (talk) 17:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
