Talk:Palaeocastor

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 12.43.6.77 in topic Palaeocastor

Artist's rendition

edit

Beyond the obvious, there are a few problems with the artist's rendition. The "horn" was in no way as obvious as in the image. This isn't Ceratogaulus. Also note that this was a burrowing animal, not an aquatic and the flattened beaver tail is also inappropriate. --Aranae 02:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

A better picture would be helpful - as it looks like a hoax the way it is now. --Trödel 04:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I found this website that has an impressive cross-section of Paleocastor. [1] Masa 20:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I have contacted the curator of that museum and he will provide some of the images under a cc-by-sa license (he is sending higher resolution versions) --Trödel 22:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I did that image originally, and have a much better one coming up. I apologize for all of the mistakes made. By the way, what "obvious"? --KnowledgeLord 07:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Palaeocastor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Palaeocastor

edit

The name Thomas barbour should read Edwin Hinkley barbour. Thomas Barbour was 9 years old in 1893. 12.43.6.77 (talk) 03:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply