Talk:Paksha

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merge

edit

Instead of having two more short articles on the two Paksha, I propose we one expanded long article on only Paksha, where the two Pakshas can be contrasted. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

There's been no response to this, but no objection either, and it makes more sense to do this than re-name the content here to "Krishna Paksha" (the other option), so I've gone ahead and done it. I trust that's OK with everyone. Moonraker12 (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Paksa

edit

article about same subject Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done ComfyKem (talk) 09:34, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paksha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply