Talk:Paddy Finucane/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 01:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   See below

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Looks pretty good to me

Some minor stuff:

1. "down wind" -> "downwind"
2. "Spring" -> spring
3. "Gazetted" -> "gazetted" (multiple times)
4. "baled" -> "bailed" (multiple times)
5. "caliber" -> "calibre"
6. "sot" -> "shot"
7. "602 squadron" -> "602 Squadron"
8. "shoto" -> "Sholto" (multiple times)
9. "610, 616 and 41 squadrons" -> "610, 616 and 41 Squadrons"

Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Hawkeye7, It looks like your concerns have been addressed, not sure why the nominator hasn't responded to you to notify you of such, but, whatever. Mr rnddude (talk) 10:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Passing article now. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)