 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
The phrase "In computing..." has been removed, as it implies a greater ubiquity of the term "packrat parser" than has yet been evidenced in the literture. This is a fairly recent advancement.
-- QTJ 20:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Figure in section "Syntax" edit
The "example" subsection ends with a figure in the middle of the text. This figure should be put properly in a figure box and referenced (or not) in the text Cellomario (talk) 12:42, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Overall a very well written page, especially the part about memoization techniques. The only suggestion that I can make is that the average reader would benefit from a more divulgative approach, both in the text and in the references Cellomario (talk) 13:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Review edit
The article is clear and well written. The main aspects of the topic are understandable by someone with no particular expertise in the area. Fdrc.Mtll (talk) 14:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Review edit
The description of the Packrat parser is very detailed and provides a useful example to understand the underlying algorithm.