Talk:Pachygyria
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mooshberry in topic Removed inappropriate section
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Pachygyria.
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
please add at least 4 photos of the condition
editWe have to add at least 4 official photos even if we have to buy them for humankind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4109:FA00:8DD8:AF26:5823:633E (talk) 14:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Removed inappropriate section
editI removed the following text from the section on Primordial Dwarfism. This is clearly plagiarism from a medical journal, and is in an inappropriate tone talking about "this girl".[1]"
68.54.106.180 (talk) 02:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- DO NOT revert the page to add plagiarism to this article. If wiki policy requires I will delete it from the Talk page as well. Continued plagiarism will be reported. 2601:441:4400:1740:A18B:5282:CC9F:9030 (talk) 02:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Per the rules at Wikipedia:Copyright_violations#Parts_of_article_violate_copyright I removed the infringing material and request the infringing material be deleted from all revisions, whatever that means. 2601:441:4400:1740:A18B:5282:CC9F:9030 (talk) 02:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- In the future, including a descriptive edit message such as "removing plagiarism" would be a lot more helpful to other editors looking over potentially malicious edits, especially when you remove paragraphs of content from an article. Additionally, this discussion did not exist when I reverted the edit.
- Good catch on the plagiarism though--Yes, this does read as if it were taken from a journal of some kind. If you'd like, you can have your hand at rephrasing it to not break wikipedia guidelines, but it's awfully example-centric so I wouldn't think it would be worthwhile. Happy editing :^) mooshberry->talk; 03:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)