Talk:PJW hash function

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Properties of this hash method

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some properties of the hash is expected. Jackzhp (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

It's a *very bad* hash function. For a list of 466K English words, it generates 4347 collisions. Much worse than FNV-1a (23 collisions) or Jenkin's OAAT (36 collisions) or even DJB2 (344 collisions). And I'm not sure whether it is notable at all. I can't find it in modern ELF specifications. --Amakuha (talk) 05:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic