This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Why is this page contentious, and that of competitive UK PC magazine PC Pro not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonjary (talk • contribs)
What makes you think the article is contentious? (I'm not saying it is or isn't, just curious). --Kateshortforbob 12:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I made a minor change regarding the launch date: although the cover said October, the magazine first appeared at the very end of August 1995 - I attended the Windows 95 launch in London during the first week that it went on sale. One of the vagaries of the UK magazine publishing market is that months listed on a cover tend to be one or two months in advance of the actual sale date so that consumers will not be tempted to think "It's nearly the end of the month and this is out of date - I'll wait a week or so before buying a copy." Jasonwhittaker (talk) 20:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
