Talk:Overlook Park station/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 20:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • Looks odd to just have that one ref in the lead, move it out to the place you expand upon the details in the main body.
  • Where is postal address referenced?
    • Not sure about this one, this was added by someone else. I can omit it, but putting the address on Google Maps takes you to the correct location. Although I'm not sure why a street median light rail station would be assigned a postal address... What do you think? --Truflip99 (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • " Interstate MAX extension" is that a thing? Is there an article?
    • Yes. Interstate MAX is synonymous with the Yellow Line. They share the same article. Clarified. --Truflip99 (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • For your season (Autumn), is it fall or Fall? Be consistent.
  • "approved in June" that year. or June 1999.
  • "the relocation of Overlook Park station's planned northbound platform to be closer" no need for "be", either the "location ... to be closer" or the "relocation ... to closer".
  • Rose Quarter should be linked first time.
  • " it is intended as a symbol of good health and longevity"[according to whom?]
  • "am" -> "a.m." per MOS.
    • MOS:TIME states either a.m. or am works.
  • " take 17 minutes to reach Expo Center station and ten minutes" 17/10 or seventeen/ten.
  • No spaced hyphens in the ref titles, spaced en-dashes please.

That's it. Short article, not much to worry about, so I'll put it on hold while we get these sorted. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 16:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: Thank you for taking the time to review this! I've addressed all of your points. --Truflip99 (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Truflip99 no worries, responded to the one open issue. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Rambling Man omitted =) --Truflip99 (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Okay, all good, so I'll promote, good work! The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.