Talk:Oregon NORML/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Oregon NORML. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Merger discussion section
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merged into National_Organization_for_the_Reform_of_Marijuana_Laws#Oregon_NORML per WP:BRANCH — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graywalls (talk • contribs) 13:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Graywalls, I undid the merge. There should be a standalone article for this affiliate, IMO. Please create talk page discussions and get consensus to make major changes. Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Please do not merge the state affiliate into the national organization page. There are affiliates within Oregon, so if anything, we might merge content for smaller affiliates into this one. Regardless, there's plenty of coverage specifically about the Oregon chapter. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- "As a general rule, the individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not considered notable enough to warrant a separate article – unless they are substantially discussed by reliable independent sources that extend beyond the chapter's local area." Please do not tell me to not merge something. See WP:BRD. If you don't like something you can object. Graywalls (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Graywalls, Right, and I'd argue there's enough coverage about the state chapter. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not going to engage with you here on this. I'll put it up for merger consensus building process at a later time. Graywalls (talk) 11:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Graywalls, Sounds good, thanks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not going to engage with you here on this. I'll put it up for merger consensus building process at a later time. Graywalls (talk) 11:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Graywalls, Right, and I'd argue there's enough coverage about the state chapter. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Note: Archiving per interaction ban. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)