This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Isn't there a problem? One of the recent yellow dot is shown above the 50 % line, when none of the polls had ACUM this high. --Aréat (talk) 14:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
No, ACUM consists of PAS and PPDA. Their combined result is indeed above 50 %. However, it is probably true that by now we should have separate lines for the two parties, since pollsters have had them separately since July 2019. --Gbuvn (talk) 14:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
I see, thanks for the explanation. Well, I think so too. There's been a split, with PDDA having a presidential candidate of its own, and now regularly criticising Sandu. There's doubt of the coalition being kept in next election.--Aréat (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Shouldn't there be a new different line for the BECS coalition of PCRM and PSRM, with those two own lines ending? The same way there were two different lines that appeared when the ACUM coalition ended with PAS and PAR getting their own lines.--Aréat (talk) 00:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
It already exists, you just can't see a line before there is more than one data point to connect. --Gbuvn (talk) 10:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the great work.--Aréat (talk) 20:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
