 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
It seems that some of the external references are not connected to the article. Three references to Dynalith and one to OVP, neither of which are referenced in the article. I propose (subject to comments) to simplify to one reference to each, with an explanation of their relevance in the main text.Jeremybennett (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think the same applies to the See Also links. I don't think LEON, OpenSPARC, S1 Core or Mico32 belong here. They are about open hardware designs in general. Jeremybennett (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've pruned the references as suggested above. Jeremybennett (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I believe the article now establishes notability and should no longer be categorized as a stub. I've requested an assessment from the Computer Hardware task force. Jeremybennett (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Importance
editTagged this article as low importance. -download | sign! 22:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC) How do you decide that it is of low importance? This is one of more known soft-core architectures. It is of course a specialist subject, but in this field (FPGA/Softcore) this is an important matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.21.25.56 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)