Talk:Online judge

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Wumbolo in topic Judge

I would like to see this article expanded upon. Online judge systems are great

External Links edit

The External Links section of this article doesn't meet the WP:EL guideline. There are around 44 links here when the guideline states: "Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum" and "...it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic. No page should be linked from a Wikipedia article unless its inclusion is justifiable according to this guideline and common sense. The burden of providing this justification is on the person who wants to include an external link."

I've started fixing the EL section by removing all of the ~44 links as I couldn't see any that would fit an "official link" or to an association of online judges. Perhaps the information can be converted to a list inside this article or a separate list page showing notable entries.

If a list isn't tenable, let's get consensus on what should be added back... If you had to pick a couple External links that fit the WP:EL that we could get consensus on, which would the be? What justification do you offer for those couple ELs? Stesmo (talk) 19:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Online judge" or "Online Judge"? edit

The article is currently inconsistent - it uses both "Online judge" and "Online Judge". What should it be? --Mortense (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Judge edit

Why do we need an article on online judges? Let's create one on offline judges and merge this one into that one. umbolo 22:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply