Talk:One from the Vault

Fair use rationale for Image:FromTheVaultGD.jpg

Image:FromTheVaultGD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

---

I have added a fair use rationale to the image. — Mudwater 03:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Set breaks

This seems to come up from time to time, so.... At the concert, "Around and Around" was the beginning of the second set, not the end of the first set. Bobby's break announcement was moved to the end of the song, and the end of disc 1, for purposes of the CD. One reference for this is the Allmusic review, which says, "Whereas the actual first set concludes here and would pick back up with a version of Chuck Berry's "Around & Around" to begin the second set, the song is tagged onto the end of Disc One." Also I'm looking at a printed copy of DeadBase XI and it says the same thing there. Furthermore the book says that "U.S. Blues" and "Blues for Allah" were the end of the second set, not encores. (On the other hand, The Set List Program, while also agreeing that "Around and Around" was the beginning of the second set, lists "Blues for Allah" as an encore.) — Mudwater ^(Talk) 01:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

"Stronger Than Dirt or Milkin' The Turkey" appears somewhere, after "Drums" I think, but I am not sure how the tracks are divided. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric

@Wastrel Way: It's in the middle of the seventh track, which is listed on the CD as "King Solomon's Marbles". Check it out, here. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 21:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello everybody! Here I believe is the definitive answer. I thought I was remembering this before, but I couldn't find it until now. The moving of the set break is documented in the album liner notes. I'm looking at the cover of the physical CD, and there's a "Technical Information" section written by Don Pearson. In the third of the three sections, it says, "... The editor was then used to assemble the songs into the final CD format, edit time between songs and to move the set break from between Marbles and Around and Around to between Around and Around and Sugaree. These edits were necessary to achieve the proper time per CD as dictated by the CD format...." Of course, they could have put "Around and Around" at the end of the first disc without moving the set break, but I guess they thought it was cooler to have the break at the end of the disc. "We're gonna take a short break, we'll be back in just a few minutes, so everybody hang loose," Bobby says. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 18:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

I've added a note about this to the Track Listing section of the article. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 01:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Track list

@Mudwater:

I have no problem with listing the section as "CD track listing" (or even "1991 CD track listing") but I also kinda feel like it implies that there’s other editions with different track lists? Like I get that on its vinyl release it’s obviously going to be split up accordingly but unless both are listed it seems weird to specify CD because - yeah, a record’s not split into “discs” but in terms of running order, the track list we have here does also apply to the vinyl. Unless I’m missing something.

Considering I’m guilty of being anal about tracklist stuff in the past I do wanna tread lightly, and Obviously it’s not a big deal and probably does not warrant this whole paragraph, but just something I noticed! Elephantranges (talk) 05:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

The bootleg LPs are all missing the final 20-minute suite. That's the main diff. Binksternet (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

@Elephantranges: I guess you're right. I've changed the section header to "Track listing". @Binksternet: I see what you mean, but the bootleg versions are explained in detail in the text of the article. Which I think is good, but the track listing section is assumed to be about the official release, I would say. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 07:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

I think we need to implement a new solution: separate track listings to represent a typical bootlegs LP, the 1991 2-CD set, and perhaps the 2013 3-LP release. So two or three tracklists.

The bootlegs would not have the "Blues for Allah" suite. The 1991 CD would not have Bill Graham's introduction.

I find it confusing to have arrows pointing to the right on some track list entries. I guess they mean the track isn't on every release. I don't think the reader will understand what they are supposed to convey. If we break the track list into two or three releases then that problem will disappear. Binksternet (talk) 20:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

@Binksternet: The arrows pointing to the right -- for some articles, they're greater-than signs instead of arrows -- indicate that the song as performed flows or transitions seamlessly, without a pause, into the following song. This is a convention widely followed for Grateful Dead concert set lists, though I agree that not all readers will know that. About the track listings, I'm not convinced that the article should include track listings for bootleg records, or that the 1991 CD is different enough to warrant its own track listing, though I'd be open to further discussion. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 21:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)