Talk:On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AndyFielding in topic Confusion re story in UK edition

Fair use rationale for Image:Onwriting.jpg edit

 

Image:Onwriting.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Done. — Laura Scudder 13:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

What does this mean? edit

This paragraph from "Appearances in other media" doesn't make sense to me. Please explain and clarify, and if you can't, please remove the paragraph. Thanks. Asides/questions are mine:

"In an episode of the TV series 'Lost,' Sawyer is fooled into thinking that he has been injected with a pacemaker, and Ben Linus shows him its effects on a white rabbit with a number 8 spray-painted on its back. This is a nod at 'the numbers' (4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42) [WHAT NUMBERS? WHERE? WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH ON WRITING?]. It is also a reference to part two of On Writing, in which Stephen King explains writing is like telepathy, and uses the bunny [WHAT BUNNY?] as an example of this [HOWSO?]."

Softlavender (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It would appear the said passage has been removed, but for future reference: There is a passage in On Writing which King references a bunny with an 8 painted on its back. The bonus features of the Lost series (season three I believe) states that many of the writers of the show are King fans and he, and his works, are referenced multiple times throughout the episodes. Whether or not the bunny is a direct reference to the one described in On Writing, would make sense, but in order to avoid WP:OR it would need a source if it is to be re-added. Blackngold29 05:04, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Stephen King's "On Writing" is the only writing book I've ever seen that was worth a damn." http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/08/interview-1.html#comment-58020 --Gwern (contribs) 01:33 5 September 2010 (GMT)

Funny.... Intentional? edit

"THOROUGHLY avoid the use of unnecessary adverbs." Enjoyed that. 68.239.81.141 (talk) 16:28, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Writing style edit

I had a go at editing the writing style in the first two sections, because (ironically enough) it didn't seem to be very good to me. Specifically, it read more like a review of the book than an objective, with a lot of fluff eg) 'Not only does King give us tips on grammar and developing plot. He also gives descriptions on writing that can help in the future.'

I still don't think it's great, but I hope what I did was an improvement. Currently the Reception section also just reads like a blurb on the back cover of the book, it needs editing down a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwarbrickJones (talkcontribs) 21:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Confusion re story in UK edition edit

The book's United Kingdom paperback edition concludes with Jumper, a short story by Garret Adams that won the On Writing competition.

Was this "competition" introduced in the prior edition? If not, when was it held, and how? And why was the winning entry included only in the UK edition, and not in King's native US? Unfortunately I don't have the UK edition, where this may be explained, and couldn't find any details elsewhere.
What's more, I've found conflicting assertions, such as this one, that King himself wrote the story:

First, King offers two stories - Jumper and Rush Call - that had originally appeared in his brother's self-published newsletter, Dave's Rag. Written while King was between the ages of twelve and thirteen, these stories present readers with a rare look into King's juvenilia, a segment of his writing from which he has often tried to distance himself.

Perhaps the article should clarify these things. I'll hang up now and take my answer off the air. – AndyFielding (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply