This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Reformed ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityReformed Christianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://oldpine.org/history/the-old-pine-story. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:17, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I made some edits using my own language, based on material from the official site. I believe this is notable due to the fact some of the parishioners were part of the American Revolution.
TiMike (talk) 22:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi! I'm sorry to have trashed the article you wrote, but copying other people's stuff is against our policies, as you know. What you write must be in your own words, and different from the source. So if the source reads "it remains the only Presbyterian structure in Philadelphia dating back to colonial and revolutionary times", you can't write "It is the last Presbyterian structure in Philadelphia dating back to colonial and revolutionary era" because "Presbyterian structure in Philadelphia dating back to colonial and revolutionary" is exactly, word-for-word, what they wrote. I've rephrased that sentence to the best of my ability.
As for notability, that will be established by adding a number of independent reliable sources about the church. Without those, I imagine that sooner or later someone (not me) will nominate this for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
