Talk:Oklahoma Territory's at-large congressional district

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Proposed merger into Oklahoma Territory edit

The information in this page should be merged into the Oklahoma Territory article, where its minimal content would support the discussion of the territorial government. I plan to proceed with the merger unless there is sufficient discussion against this move. Discussion will close June 28, 2013. Bruin2 (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I'm inclined to oppose merely on the basis of parallelism with all the similar articles in Category:At-large United States congressional districts. While other stuff is not always a good guide, the rationale given here would also apply to many of those other articles and as such, the discussion should probably consider the group in general. olderwiser 14:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • I find both arguments strong, but I think it needs to be merged for the time being and separated back out if there is sufficient content provided to make a stand-alone article. Okheric (talk) 18:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Opposed I agree with Bkonrad- We would have to this with the other states.-thank you-RFD (talk) 23:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Merger implementation This issue has remained open far longer than originally intended, without generating much additional input. While a few users oppose the merger because other states have already adopted another system, I am not convinced that the prior format best presents the information for Oklahoma Territory. Therefore, I will proceed to integrate the content from this article into the more general Oklahoma Territorial article. Bruin2 (talk) 19:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Text transfer completed edit

Text from the main page into Oklahoma Territory has been completed. Bruin2 (talk) 06:15, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oklahoma Territory's at-large congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply