Talk:Ogre Kingdoms (Warhammer)

Marked for deletion

'Entirely bereft of secondary sources; minor fantasy variant of the Dungeons & Dragons creature'

A lack of secondary sources is somewhat justified as the majority of the article is factual information taken from primary sources, although sources could be cited. However, the 'minor fantasy variant' claim is unsubstantiated as the D&D Ogre bears only the most cursory resemblance. Furthermore, as this article represents a full race of Warhammer Fantasy Battles, it would be illogical to simply link to the completely unrelated Ogre (Dungeons & Dragons) page from the main Warhammer page. Note that, for example, High Elves has a page, also bereft of secondary sources, and very similar to D&D counterparts, and yet it and other WFB pages are not marked for deletion.

On these grounds, there is insufficient reason to delete the page entirely and I have removed the offending tag. 98.114.198.214 (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Ogre Pic

The ogre picture under bulls seemed a bit big, but I do not know how to make it smaller. I removed it but go ahead and put it back if its really okay. 68.126.190.28 03:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

leadbelchers

"Due to Ogres being somewhat dim, Leadbelchers are also known to hold the cannon the wrong way. Leadbelchers are so skilled with their cannons that they wield them just as easily as an Ogre Bull wields his club." Lol, they say they cannot even hold them right but then they talk about how skilled they are in the sentence that follows it?

"Concept sketch"?

I'd much prefer a picture of the painted models. Also, is this really a "concept sketch"? A concept sketch (to me) implies that something was created by GW while they were in the process of designing the ogres. This just looks like a fan picture of a GW ogre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Señor Service (talk • contribs) 20:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)