Talk:Ogonek

Latest comment: 1 year ago by PaleoNeonate in topic What's missing?

What's missing? edit

Thanks. Tells me everything except how to pronounce it -- what I came here to learn. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 17:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Of course it doesn't, as it differs between languages. Double sharp (talk) 08:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The m with ogonek is in New Marshallese but it ISN'T in the list of ogonek letters. FIX THIS! PhoenixSummon (talk) 00:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The new Marshallese orthography uses a cedilla (where the line curves to the left as it descends) rather than an ogonek (where the line curves to the right); it is already listed on the Cedilla page. - LaetusStudiis (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Something else that's missing and would be nice would be some history, i.e. oldest known usage, when it was adopted by major language standardisation efforts and which. It's the type of information that often is lacking in relation to script and punctuation articles. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 00:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ogonek edit

"Ogonek" is in Polish,in English it is ,,tail" 205.201.55.68 (talk) 12:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why has no one corrected it yet? Kittens are fluffy and cute (talk) 09:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Looks like the word ogonek is accepted in English. Also used in (English language) Unicode name for this diacritic. Note that "tail" could be more confusing. DePiep (talk) 09:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply