Talk:Oerlikon GDF

Another Skyguard

The entry "Skyguard" redirects to this page, but I have recently read news on a different military related system with the same name. See this link. Maybe we should change the redirect? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.11 (talk • contribs) .

Sounds reasonable. Though it's probably better to covert Skyguard into a disambig page. Has someone created an article about the Northrop Skyguard system ? Megapixie 01:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Done, and I've created a stub article off the disambig page for the Northrop system. Sigh. I wish someone in the Arms industry would show a little imagination when it comes to system names - like the good old Green Cheese missile. Megapixie 01:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/10/robot-cannon-ki.html Watcha' guys think? 213.35.180.152 18:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Number of rounds on GDF-005

The entry on the number of rounds in reserve is wrong.

For the GDF-005 (as in Service with the Austrian Armed Forces) the distribution of round is as follows:

ready:
56 rounds ( 8 clips with 7 rounds each) per cannon = 2 x 56 = 112 rounds ready
reserve:
84 rounds (12 clips with 7 rounds each) per cannon = 2 x 84 = 168 rounds in reserve

Sum:
2 x 140 rounds = 280 rounds on the gun

Source: field manual for Oerlikon 35 mm twin cannon Anti-aircraft gun system

The number or rounds kept in reserve could be varying with different models. But I consider 128 rounds in reserve to be wrong since the number of rounds must be divisible by 7 (the standard clip size) - the result being integer (the number of clips).

I will leave my statement open for discussion. If it doesn't meet with disagreement I will edit the incorrect entry accordingly. (Feulto (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC))

The problem was that the original numbers were for the GDF-002 (and were wrong) which carried less rounds. I've moved both sets of numbers to the specific description of the model in the variants section. Megapixie (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for inserting the changes it into the appropriate places (and being a newbie to wikipedia myself, saving me the trouble to do it ;). Since the Oerlikon 35mm entry is the only one featuring the 'Skyguard' fire control radar system I might add some information to this section (e.g. newer Skyguard versions are equipped with a laser range finder). But first I will have to give some classification issues a thought.(Feulto (talk) 19:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC))

References

Hi Wikipedians, just reviewed article and several main points need citations to verifiable sources, e.g.: "Users". Re-rated article for that reason. Please improve citations before uprating again. Regards,DPdH (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

How is there no discussion in the article of the velocity-measuring devices?

These are an extremely unique feature, which are pointed out in an image caption, but not addressed in the body of the article.

What are they? Why are they? What do they do? 216.74.247.250 (talk) 20:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)