Talk:Object request broker
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 199.46.198.232 in topic Vendor comparison
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Object request broker article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Woefully deficient edit
This article seems pretty much like a stub. ORB is a huge technology and widely deployed within enterprise systems. It seems like a lot more can be said. Object life-cycle management, data persistence management, session management, security, transaction management, performance issues, cross-platform integration, etc. Any objections to adding an 'expert needed' tag? Ronnotel 04:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but Wikipedia policy is that articles must show evidence via citations to independent sources that their subjects are notable. My guess is that someone thought this term in general would catch on to describe more than the Common Object Request Broker Architecture, but do not think it did. When people say "ORB" they probably mean the CORBA ORB, so suggest just a redirect until other ones besides the "Common" one are available in citations. W Nowicki (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Vendor comparison edit
Can there be a table of what CORBA version, what language bindings (and versions there in) a vendors implementation supports? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.198.232 (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)