Talk:Nuke (video games)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

Modern warfare nuke

edit

Are modern wafare nukes actually "nukes"? it doesn't actually damage anything, only ends the game. --Fulizer (talk) 08:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, it does fit the definition of a game-ending or nearly-so super weapon. However, it shouldn't be the first reference, nor should it be grouped with RTS and turn-based games, as it is neither. Bakkster Man (talk) 20:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

What I meant was that the descriptionof it was incomplete and exists on this page only because of a craze for the game, I personally do not consider it a notable use of the phrase "nuke".--Fulizer (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Final Fantasy Nuke

edit

The article, as I understand, describes "Nuke" as gaming terminology, as defined in its MMORPG and Strategy counterparts, and not "in gaming" in general. How would a single spell in one game be of any relevance, especially as not more than one sentence can be written about it? --Scottie theNerd 14:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The only real nuke that I could think of in FF is Knights of the Round. Even so, I've never really heard the term "nuke" used towards any FF spells (or SP RPG's for that matter) [but then again I dont run heavily in those circles] Dogabutila (talk) 08:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:First-person (gaming) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply