Talk:Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 22, 2008, November 22, 2011, November 22, 2013, and November 22, 2018. |
Engines? edit
Why does this article apparently contain no detail of the plane’s engines? This information appears to be given at https://www.northropgrumman.com/what-we-do/air/b-2-stealth-bomber/b-2-technical-details/ Gsoper (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- This article says "Powerplant: 4 × General Electric F118-GE-100 non-afterburning turbofans, 17,300 lbf (77 kN) thrust each", and links to the General Electric F118 article. So there is a whole article about the engines. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 14:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response, I can see the reference to powerplant now and I can also see how I missed it in the Specification section. I expected to find some mention of them in the Sesign section and visually scanned that section (on the mobile view), found nothing and then searched the article for the word ‘engine’, again finding nothing. It does feel like something of an omission and maybe some more obvious mention could be made? Gsoper (talk) 16:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
'Crash' vs 'accident' edit
Hi @Fnlayson, I saw you reverted my edit. Can you explain what you mean by "more formal wording"? Crash is a perfectly acceptable term for the incidents contained in the section, and probably the more correct one. Please see the MOS discussion and recent writing on the use of the word "crash" vs "accident." Unless a source in the article is directly using the word "accident" we should be using the word "crash" with rare exceptions.
- Additional reading here:
- https://www.cjr.org/language_corner/associated-press-collision.php
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1120417/
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch/Archive 14#"Accident" revisited Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 23:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- My apologies for bringing this to your talk page instead of here initially. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 23:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- The Aircraft project guidelines (WP:Air/PC) lists a section label of "Accidents and incidents" (or just Accidents) for aircraft articles. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'll open a discussion there. Hopeful to hear your input. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 00:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Some inconsistencies edit
In the specifications section, it is listed as being capable of officially 18,000kg payload and estimated 23,000 kg max payload. Simultaneously, it is said to be capable of carrying 2 GBU 57s, each being 14,000 Kg. I dont know if this would be OR or can fall under WP:SKYBLUE, but atleast one of those figures needs correction. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)