Talk:Non-contact thermography

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Non-contact thermography.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Necessary disambiguation or generalization edit

From etymological point of view — stricto el lato sensu — it seems to me there is no consistent basis regarding thermology (simply and no more...) to be or refer to only medical science.

Conversely, medical science, as newer branch on human journey scope when compared with physical science, may not comprise thermology, generally and uniquely as yours. This is a bad or nonsense comprehension!

For the desired and correct purpose, it will be better to say "Thermology" when referring to physical (generalist sense), and "Medical thermology" (one of so many specific senses) if referring to "the application of thermal concepts, ideas or technologies on medical issues".

Ex positis meritum citatum, I am proposing this page for disambiguation. [Beremiz Jan 2007]

Just because some quacks are using does not mean it is bullshit edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

It's such as sad day when writers like (JzG) will not let the truth be told....We are dealing with peoples lives. This article is far from being balanced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magenta1984 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

It is a fairly important tool where mammography is not an option (<35y, nursing). Just one of a few tools that help in a situation where it is very hard to make decisions. Richiez (talk) 00:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Correct. That is why I wanted the content ion a single place where the valid uses can be seen, and the obviously invalid compared. Popele are using the valid uses as a trojan horse to assert the invalid, y'see. Guy (Help!) 23:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic