Talk:Nobelman v. American Savings Bank

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

context/confusion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is a "cram down"? What where the major points raised by the Court? Who was Nobleman and how did the case end up in the Supreme Court? In laymans terms, describe the lending policy that American Savings Bank was employing. Was this a widespread practice?

Create a reference section and place the sources in same.Stormbay (talk) 21:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Article Rewrite edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I believe that this article should be TNT'd and rewritten from scratch. I'd be happy to do that, provided that there are no objections to my so doing. I've started drafting a re-written version of this article, which can be found here. If no objections to my TNT-ing and re-writing this article have been made within forty-five (45) days from the posting of this comment, I'll take that as a green light to proceed with the TNT/re-write. Thanks, -- Passerculus90 (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic