Talk:Nkandla compound firepool controversy
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Dodger67 in topic Firepool not unique.
 | A fact from Nkandla compound firepool controversy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Meaningless without dates to serve as a historical anchor
Firepool not unique. edit
Use of swimming pools as a water source for firefighting is common in Australia.
The assertion that "this is the only firepool in existence" is ridiculous. Is Google broken in your country ?
Type "swimming pool firefighting" and you will see a multitude of links to equipment supplies and official guidelines from firefighting organizations. Lathamibird (talk) 11:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- That's not the point. Using water from a swimming pool to fight fires is common, but telling the world "this is not a swimming pool, it is a firepool" and thus try to justify a luxury item as an "essential security feature" that the taxpayer must pay for, is basically the controversy. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)